708
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 20:
Line 20: + +
Debate:Is there a problem with simply copying content from other sites? (view source)
Revision as of 23:29, July 12, 2007
, 23:29, July 12, 2007→Yes
Since Conservapedia is an encyclopedia, I feel that articles on Conservapedia should be original work based on facts rather than straight copy and pasting. [[User:Jinkas|Jinkas]] 17:53, 11 July 2007 (EDT)
Since Conservapedia is an encyclopedia, I feel that articles on Conservapedia should be original work based on facts rather than straight copy and pasting. [[User:Jinkas|Jinkas]] 17:53, 11 July 2007 (EDT)
I want to add to my point: Rather than wholesale copying of menial information about baseball terms or naval ships or football terms (things that are very well documented elsewhere), why isn't time being focused on the requested pages [[Conservapedia:Articles_That_Need_To_Created|here]] or [[Special:Wantedpages|here]]? Do we want Conservapedia to be valued for it's complete list of volcano terminology or do we wanted users who come here to be able to find out more about [[Divine grace]], [[Divinity of Jesus]], or the [[Impact of Jesus on world history]]? [[User:Jinkas|Jinkas]] 19:29, 12 July 2007 (EDT)