1
edit
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 22:
Line 22: + + +
Debate:Is there a problem with simply copying content from other sites? (view source)
Revision as of 00:36, July 13, 2007
, 00:36, July 13, 2007→Maybe: added
I want to add to my point: Rather than wholesale copying of menial information about baseball terms or naval ships or football terms (things that are very well documented elsewhere), why isn't time being focused on the requested pages [[Conservapedia:Articles_That_Need_To_Created|here]] or [[Special:Wantedpages|here]]? Do we want Conservapedia to be valued for it's complete list of volcano terminology or do we wanted users who come here to be able to find out more about [[Divine grace]], [[Divinity of Jesus]], or the [[Impact of Jesus on world history]]? [[User:Jinkas|Jinkas]] 19:29, 12 July 2007 (EDT)
I want to add to my point: Rather than wholesale copying of menial information about baseball terms or naval ships or football terms (things that are very well documented elsewhere), why isn't time being focused on the requested pages [[Conservapedia:Articles_That_Need_To_Created|here]] or [[Special:Wantedpages|here]]? Do we want Conservapedia to be valued for it's complete list of volcano terminology or do we wanted users who come here to be able to find out more about [[Divine grace]], [[Divinity of Jesus]], or the [[Impact of Jesus on world history]]? [[User:Jinkas|Jinkas]] 19:29, 12 July 2007 (EDT)
==Maybe==
It's OK to copy images from wikipedia, just not the content, right? [[User:Joseph88|Joseph88]] 20:36, 12 July 2007 (EDT)