Changes

B: china is already a world power, it has alot of power ni the u.n, and is a perminet member on the un security council, europe is back on the rise two, the eu has boosted their economy so much its better than ours, they will always remain a major power in the world, it would be very vey hard to get rid of the u.n, how would they? they can pull out but get rid of it? they could threaten people to withdraw, but at risk of their own country?

B: china is already a world power, it has alot of power ni the u.n, and is a perminet member on the un security council, europe is back on the rise two, the eu has boosted their economy so much its better than ours, they will always remain a major power in the world, it would be very vey hard to get rid of the u.n, how would they? they can pull out but get rid of it? they could threaten people to withdraw, but at risk of their own country?

:(a)I didn't say it was bad, it's just useless and has always been so.  It never had any power, and sure doesn't today.

:(a)I didn't say it was bad, it's just useless and has always been so.  It never had any power, and sure doesn't today.

:(b)You're still missing the point.  The UN is a creation of the US State Department.  Britain had an hand in shaping it, too.  China was convinced by the US State Dept & Britain to go along.  When China becomes top dog, and the US was when it created the UN, China will be free to keep the UN as its means of governing the planet (as  the US & GB have done since 1945) or dispose of it and start over with a creation of its own.

:(b)You're still missing the point.  The UN is a creation of the US State Department.  Britain had an hand in shaping it, too.  China was convinced by the US State Dept & Britain to go along.  When China becomes top dog, as the US was when it created the UN, China will be free to keep the UN as its means of governing the planet (as  the US & GB have done since 1945) or dispose of it and start over with a creation of its own.

:(c)Sorry for the crash course on ''Realpolitick''.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 00:48, 20 July 2007 (EDT)

:(c)Sorry for the crash course on ''Realpolitick''.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 00:48, 20 July 2007 (EDT)

==impossible==

==impossible==

Russia never had "stealth" communism before - they had an overt system of psuedo-communism.  As they never had stealth communism in the past, Russia is unable to reinstall it, whatever it is.  --[[User:LiteratiChamp|LiteratiChamp]] 19:31, 19 July 2007 (EDT)

Russia never had "stealth" communism before - they had an overt system of psuedo-communism.  As they never had stealth communism in the past, Russia is unable to reinstall it, whatever it is.  --[[User:LiteratiChamp|LiteratiChamp]] 19:31, 19 July 2007 (EDT)