Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 47: Line 47:     
:::Thanks for bringing up Kyoto, and the obligations of the signatory countries, specifically Spain.  Just a few very short years ago, an oil tanker sent a mayday, yet Spain, a member of Kyoto, refused to tow the ship into port.  Why?  They didn't want to pollute their harbor with a little oil.  So they let the ship sink at sea, which sent a lot of oil on their beaches.  That's an example of hypocrisy their: stating they won't pollute, yet refusing to stop pollution when they had the chance. Thanks for reminding me to include it in the article!  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 13:14, 23 July 2007 (EDT)
 
:::Thanks for bringing up Kyoto, and the obligations of the signatory countries, specifically Spain.  Just a few very short years ago, an oil tanker sent a mayday, yet Spain, a member of Kyoto, refused to tow the ship into port.  Why?  They didn't want to pollute their harbor with a little oil.  So they let the ship sink at sea, which sent a lot of oil on their beaches.  That's an example of hypocrisy their: stating they won't pollute, yet refusing to stop pollution when they had the chance. Thanks for reminding me to include it in the article!  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 13:14, 23 July 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
::::Again, that's a straw man. No where was I advocating Kyoto. Rather, the principles behind Kyoto. Kyoto is deeply flawed, but at least it ''tries'' to combat the problem of greenhouse gas emissions rather than let it all go to heck. Thank god that we've got a great generation of atmospheric scientists coming up who might be able o solve the catastrophe being left to them. [[User:Stryker|Stryker]] 08:30, 24 July 2007 (EDT)
    
== Couple of points/comments ==
 
== Couple of points/comments ==
228

edits

Navigation menu