nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW
2,701
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 9:
Line 9: + + + +
not sure if this is where i bring this to attention...
Should a sysop be given power to permanently delete a user for anything less than an egregious crime?
Should a sysop be given power to permanently delete a user for anything less than an egregious crime?
:Comment by Fox:You're absolutely right - I believe there was a mistake, and I was actually blocking you for trolling in the Main page:Talk; (although that is often the place to find many liberal parodists posing as outraged conservatives.) [[Image:User Fox.png]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] <small>([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])</small> 14:47, 12 July 2007 (EDT)
:Comment by Fox:You're absolutely right - I believe there was a mistake, and I was actually blocking you for trolling in the Main page:Talk; (although that is often the place to find many liberal parodists posing as outraged conservatives.) [[Image:User Fox.png]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] <small>([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])</small> 14:47, 12 July 2007 (EDT)
== not sure if this is where i bring this to attention... ==
A sysop might want to block [[User:RWest]] for [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Ann_Coulter/1&diff=prev&oldid=248430 this] edit. [[User:GregLarson | Greg]] 16:02, 24 July 2007 (EDT)