Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 132: Line 132:     
Additionally, [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Margaret_Sanger&oldid=249661 this version] of the lead doesn't mention her nationality, doesn't mention her eugenics beliefs until halfway in, and uses the loaded and inaccurate term "propaganized." Near as I can tell, she just came out and said that non-white races were inferior and should be marginalized because she felt they were inferior. Arguing for a hateful, ugly idea isn't propaganda automatically. [[User:AManInBlack|AManInBlack]] 19:22, 25 July 2007 (EDT)
 
Additionally, [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Margaret_Sanger&oldid=249661 this version] of the lead doesn't mention her nationality, doesn't mention her eugenics beliefs until halfway in, and uses the loaded and inaccurate term "propaganized." Near as I can tell, she just came out and said that non-white races were inferior and should be marginalized because she felt they were inferior. Arguing for a hateful, ugly idea isn't propaganda automatically. [[User:AManInBlack|AManInBlack]] 19:22, 25 July 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
:AManInBlack, you seem to be gaming the system, attempting to marginalize Sanger's infamy, while promoting aspects (birth control) that make Sanger a liberal hero.  This is conservapedia, and Sanger did start what became planned parenthood.  And emphasizing this, as is emphasized in conservative circles, makes the article distinctly consrvative.  Now, if you have a site that says Sanger did not start what became planned parenthood, I'm interested.  But please stop with the liberal spin. 
 +
:You may have other valid points, but they do not provide cover for attempting to diminish the role of Sanger in the "evolution" of the legalization of abortion.  Unless you have a site that states Sanger did not start what became planned parenthood, do not mingle the liberal bias with your other edits (which I assume are productive).  {{User:PheasantHunter/FullSig}} 22:57, 25 July 2007 (EDT)

Navigation menu