231
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 133:
Line 133: − + − + + + +
→The Hope Clinic reference and the "propaganized" version of the lead
Additionally, [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Margaret_Sanger&oldid=249661 this version] of the lead doesn't mention her nationality, doesn't mention her eugenics beliefs until halfway in, and uses the loaded and inaccurate term "propaganized." Near as I can tell, she just came out and said that non-white races were inferior and should be marginalized because she felt they were inferior. Arguing for a hateful, ugly idea isn't propaganda automatically. [[User:AManInBlack|AManInBlack]] 19:22, 25 July 2007 (EDT)
Additionally, [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Margaret_Sanger&oldid=249661 this version] of the lead doesn't mention her nationality, doesn't mention her eugenics beliefs until halfway in, and uses the loaded and inaccurate term "propaganized." Near as I can tell, she just came out and said that non-white races were inferior and should be marginalized because she felt they were inferior. Arguing for a hateful, ugly idea isn't propaganda automatically. [[User:AManInBlack|AManInBlack]] 19:22, 25 July 2007 (EDT)
:AManInBlack, you seem to be gaming the system, attempting to marginalize Sanger's infamy, while promoting aspects (birth control) that make Sanger a liberal hero. This is conservapedia, and Sanger did start what became planned parenthood. And emphasizing this, as is emphasized in conservative circles, makes the article distinctly consrvative. Now, if you have a site that says Sanger did not start what became planned parenthood, I'm interested. But please stop with the liberal spin.
:<s>AManInBlack, you seem to be gaming the system, attempting to marginalize Sanger's infamy, while promoting aspects (birth control) that make Sanger a liberal hero. This is conservapedia, and Sanger did start what became planned parenthood. And emphasizing this, as is emphasized in conservative circles, makes the article distinctly consrvative. Now, if you have a site that says Sanger did not start what became planned parenthood, I'm interested. But please stop with the liberal spin.
:You may have other valid points, but they do not provide cover for attempting to diminish the role of Sanger in the "evolution" of the legalization of abortion. Unless you have a site that states Sanger did not start what became planned parenthood, do not mingle the liberal bias with your other edits (which I assume are productive). {{User:PheasantHunter/FullSig}} 22:57, 25 July 2007 (EDT)
:You may have other valid points, but they do not provide cover for attempting to diminish the role of Sanger in the "evolution" of the legalization of abortion. Unless you have a site that states Sanger did not start what became planned parenthood, do not mingle the liberal bias with your other edits (which I assume are productive).</s>{{User:PheasantHunter/FullSig}} 22:57, 25 July 2007 (EDT)
:::I retract the above, but still need to add a few comments. Just want to add a few more points. Propaganda is unrelated to whether or not an idea is hateful. But writing books, giving speeches, and advocating and organizing is not merely arguring. You claimed that the word "discoursed" was archaic (though my dictionary doesn't support you on this.) I agree that discourse is inadequate, because it does not include her written and other non-verbal activities. We had war propaganda during WWII, and there is no need to sugar coat propaganda. "Evangelized" might be a better word, but it has connotations associated with relgion. What word do you propose.
:::This is conservapedia, and Sanger did start what became planned parenthood. And emphasizing this, as is emphasized in conservative circles, makes the article distinctly conservative. That it is true is not in dispute. Now, if you have a reference says Sanger had nothing to do with the organization that became planned parenthood, I'm interested. {{User:PheasantHunter/FullSig}} 23:11, 25 July 2007 (EDT)