It is '''very''' misleading to refer to this specious mathematical whimsy as "our study". This is the kind of claim that kills the respect that Conservapedia could have. It is a legetimate poll result combined with an irrelevant reference to obscure Wikipedian categorization (by the way, the count is 81-76 Liberal-Conservative, so this bizarre "study" isn't even valid anymore). I understand that it is a flagship statement, but it is wrong, and is deleterious to Conservapedia's mission. -- [[User:RWest|RWest]] 9:38, 27 July 2007
:I agree with Aschlafly's assessment, based on my 5 1/2 years of participation in the Wikipedia project:
:I agree with Aschlafly's assessment, based on my 5 1/2 years of participation in the Wikipedia project: