Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 106: Line 106:  
==Liberal bias of Wikipedia==
 
==Liberal bias of Wikipedia==
   −
It is '''very''' misleading to refer to this specious mathematical whimsy as "our study".  This is the kind of claim that kills the respect that Conservapedia could have.  It is a legetimate poll result combined with an irrelevant reference to obscure Wikipedian categorization (by the way, the count is 81-76 Liberal-Conservative, so this bizarre "study" isn't even valid anymore).  I understand that it is a flagship statement, but it is wrong, and is deleterious to Conservapedia's mission. -- [[User:RWest|RWest]] 9:38, 27 July 2007
+
It is '''very''' misleading to refer to this specious mathematical whimsy as "our study".  This is the kind of claim that kills the respect that Conservapedia could have.  It is a legitimate poll result combined with an irrelevant reference to obscure Wikipedian categorization (by the way, the count today is 81-76 Liberal-Conservative, so the evidence for this "study" isn't valid anymore).  I understand that it is a flagship statement, but it is wrong, and is deleterious to Conservapedia's mission. -- [[User:RWest|RWest]] 9:38, 27 July 2007
    
:I agree with Aschlafly's assessment, based on my 5 1/2 years of participation in the Wikipedia project:  
 
:I agree with Aschlafly's assessment, based on my 5 1/2 years of participation in the Wikipedia project:  
45

edits

Navigation menu