| Line 88: |
Line 88: |
| | Retrieved from "http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Aschlafly" | | Retrieved from "http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Aschlafly" |
| | | | |
| | + | == Moved from BrianRobertson's Talk Page == |
| | | | |
| | + | Please remove re-directs and merges. --<font color="#0002AC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]</font><sup><font color="OOFFAA">[[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font></sup> 14:51, 2 August 2007 (EDT) |
| | + | |
| | + | Sorry, I can't read your name? [[User:BrianRobertson|BrianRobertson]] 14:56, 2 August 2007 (EDT) |
| | + | |
| | + | *Sorry, it's about time to say goodbye.....--<font color="#0002AC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]</font><sup><font color="OOFFAA">[[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font></sup> 15:05, 2 August 2007 (EDT) |
| | + | |
| | + | What?!!! You're going to BAN me?!!! [[User:BrianRobertson|BrianRobertson]] 15:06, 2 August 2007 (EDT) |
| | + | |
| | + | *I certainly don't have a problem blocking vandals, which is what I consider you to be. You do not ask for feed-back, you revert the edits of one of our best contributors with little or no edit notes, and absolutely no discussion on the talk page. You have given a decidedly Liberal spin to the article, which we all know is a form of [[deceit]]. --<font color="#0002AC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]</font><sup><font color="OOFFAA">[[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font></sup> 15:25, 2 August 2007 (EDT) |
| | + | |
| | + | Vandal? Hardly - I removed none of your content barring opinion. No Feed-back? Hardly - I offered evidence on the Talk page, we discussed it, others agreed. A Sysop - Crocoite - agreed with the redirect of an acronym. I gave notes constantly. I asked openly for "help" with the edit in the summary, and also added a "how am i doing?" in another summary. You can see extensive dialogue between you and I and others on the Talk page. And if adding references from widely accepted sources like Nielsen is 'liberal', I can't agree with that - they are used by every broadcaster worldwide. I can hardly see how much more open I could have been? I have not tried to deceive anyone, as I have characterised all entires as 'some believe one thing', providing references, and 'others believe another', providing references. I simply don't understand your comments. [[User:BrianRobertson|BrianRobertson]] 15:36, 2 August 2007 (EDT) |
| | | | |
| | ==Debate over the merge of MSM and Mainstream Media== | | ==Debate over the merge of MSM and Mainstream Media== |
| | One other point: would you agree that, forgetting everything else we're discussing, MSM should be a redirect to Mainstream Media? if not, can you explain why an acronym should NOT redirect to its actual term? [[User:BrianRobertson|BrianRobertson]] 15:48, 2 August 2007 (EDT) | | One other point: would you agree that, forgetting everything else we're discussing, MSM should be a redirect to Mainstream Media? if not, can you explain why an acronym should NOT redirect to its actual term? [[User:BrianRobertson|BrianRobertson]] 15:48, 2 August 2007 (EDT) |