386
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 27:
Line 27: + +
→"Gibberish"
:Re-read it. Your sentence was either grammatically incorrect or was instructing the reader to reject the old earth timeline. Rather than try to determine your intent, I just reverted it to what was already a perfectly good sentence written by [[User:Conservative|Conservative]].--[[User:Conservateur|Conservateur]] 12:58, 7 August 2007 (EDT)
:Re-read it. Your sentence was either grammatically incorrect or was instructing the reader to reject the old earth timeline. Rather than try to determine your intent, I just reverted it to what was already a perfectly good sentence written by [[User:Conservative|Conservative]].--[[User:Conservateur|Conservateur]] 12:58, 7 August 2007 (EDT)
::So which is it? Do you think it was grammatically incorrect, or do you think it was "instructing the reader to reject the old earth timeline"? That you've put two possibilities suggests to me that you don't actually know what was wrong with it! I reject that it has either fault, by the way, so please actually point out the specific fault(s). [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 22:39, 7 August 2007 (EDT)
::So which is it? Do you think it was grammatically incorrect, or do you think it was "instructing the reader to reject the old earth timeline"? That you've put two possibilities suggests to me that you don't actually know what was wrong with it! I reject that it has either fault, by the way, so please actually point out the specific fault(s). [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 22:39, 7 August 2007 (EDT)
:::Um, my point was that I couldn't tell which it was. Your sentence ended with the clause "so reject these dates." You tell me what you meant by that.--[[User:Conservateur|Conservateur]] 10:58, 8 August 2007 (EDT)