nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 29:
Line 29: + + + + +
→"Gibberish": Here's what it referred to.
:::Um, my point was that I couldn't tell which it was. Your sentence ended with the clause "so reject these dates." You tell me what you meant by that.--[[User:Conservateur|Conservateur]] 10:58, 8 August 2007 (EDT)
:::Um, my point was that I couldn't tell which it was. Your sentence ended with the clause "so reject these dates." You tell me what you meant by that.--[[User:Conservateur|Conservateur]] 10:58, 8 August 2007 (EDT)
::::Here's the clause in context of the entire sentence and previous sentence, highlighting the part referred to by that clause:
{{quoteBox|Under the dates assigned by uniformitarian geologists, it represents approximately the period of Earth's history from '''145 million years ago''' to '''65 million years ago'''.<br /><br />
Flood geologists reject the uniformitarian assumptions behind the dates derived by secular geologists, so reject these dates...}}
::::That is, flood geologists reject the dates of 145 million years ago and 65 millions years ago derived by secular geologists because they reject the uniformitarian assumptions behind those dates.
::::[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 11:20, 8 August 2007 (EDT)