Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
327 bytes added ,  00:44, August 9, 2007
Line 36: Line 36:  
:::::That's the defense, seriously?  Just because liberals are considered a shade less blameworthy than the devil, the comparison is inherently legit?  You're winning the rhetorical battle and losing the argumentative war - wake up and pay attention.  --[[User:ColtsQuinn|ColtsQuinn]] 20:16, 8 August 2007 (EDT)
 
:::::That's the defense, seriously?  Just because liberals are considered a shade less blameworthy than the devil, the comparison is inherently legit?  You're winning the rhetorical battle and losing the argumentative war - wake up and pay attention.  --[[User:ColtsQuinn|ColtsQuinn]] 20:16, 8 August 2007 (EDT)
 
:::::::What defense?  I neither made the comparison, nor am I engaged in a rhetorical battle, nor a argumentative war.  I am wondering where you saw liberals compared to the devil. [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]]
 
:::::::What defense?  I neither made the comparison, nor am I engaged in a rhetorical battle, nor a argumentative war.  I am wondering where you saw liberals compared to the devil. [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]]
 +
 +
:::To Quinn and Quinn (a coincidence?), you are making assumptions that have not been placed into the argument.  The degree of difference between the devil and liberals is never discussed, nor is it implied.  The "shade less blameworthy" is your own creation. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 20:44, 8 August 2007 (EDT)
nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
13,818

edits

Navigation menu