nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 38:
Line 38: + + + + + +
Back on topic...
:::To Quinn and Quinn (a coincidence?), you are making assumptions that have not been placed into the argument. The degree of difference between the devil and liberals is never discussed, nor is it implied. The "shade less blameworthy" is your own creation. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 20:44, 8 August 2007 (EDT)
:::To Quinn and Quinn (a coincidence?), you are making assumptions that have not been placed into the argument. The degree of difference between the devil and liberals is never discussed, nor is it implied. The "shade less blameworthy" is your own creation. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 20:44, 8 August 2007 (EDT)
== Back on topic... ==
I totally agree with Hojimachong's comment above:
{{QuoteBox|Categories are meant to be for subjects relating to that thing, like [[Deceit]], [[Deceitful comments]], [[methods of deceit]], [[examples of deceit]], etc.}}
The only articles currently included that should stay are [[Deceit]] and maybe [[Perjury]]. [[Democratic Party]], [[Global warming denial]], [[Homosexual Agenda]], [[Liberal]], and [[Liberal bias]] (bias and deceit are two different things) should all go. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 05:57, 9 August 2007 (EDT)