123
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 65:
Line 65: + +
Conservapedia:Desk/Abuse (view source)
Revision as of 17:59, August 10, 2007
, 17:59, August 10, 2007→Why don't you delete the recently added article about [[Woody Allen]]?
:There is a difference between a biography and a piece dealing with opinion information. I believe if you were to create small biographies on notable people that you would not see your work removed. I also believe that you are probably aware of the difference, but are complaining simply because you do not like it. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 13:44, 10 August 2007 (EDT)
:There is a difference between a biography and a piece dealing with opinion information. I believe if you were to create small biographies on notable people that you would not see your work removed. I also believe that you are probably aware of the difference, but are complaining simply because you do not like it. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 13:44, 10 August 2007 (EDT)
::I really don't disagree with you. Sysop Conservative originally stated that my article was not "nuanced". By pointing out some articles that are very small, incomplete and lop-sided I was trying to show that writing an "un-nuanced" article was not cause for deletion, it is cause for editing. Also, this particular article on Woody Allen is only a biography in disguise. When the only thing you can highlight about the life and career of a celebrated and revered actor, writer and director is that he married his 27 years old adopted daughter, it is an opinion piece. Respectfully [[User:Wismike|Wismike]]