Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 12: Line 12:  
*Attempts to discredit Conservapedia
 
*Attempts to discredit Conservapedia
 
**I think this is WAY too restrictive. It would make pretty much ALL current news reports and blogs that reported on Conservapedia guilty of copyright violation. And I'm (still) not a lawyer, but what does Fair Use say there? --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 23:39, 11 March 2007 (EDT)
 
**I think this is WAY too restrictive. It would make pretty much ALL current news reports and blogs that reported on Conservapedia guilty of copyright violation. And I'm (still) not a lawyer, but what does Fair Use say there? --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 23:39, 11 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
: Good points, Sid.  I think we could delete that item you reference ("Attempts to discredit Conservapedia").  We respect free speech rights to criticize us.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 23:43, 11 March 2007 (EDT)
 
*Changing information negatively and then citing Conservapedia
 
*Changing information negatively and then citing Conservapedia
 +
*Harming an editor in some way, such as publishing his name with his entries in a way that hurts his employment
 +
*Copying the entire site and using it to confuse potential visitors in some manner
 +
*Copying material and then incorporating it into something that claims a new copyright that is asserted back against Conservapedia or an editor
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,360

edits

Navigation menu