| Line 10: |
Line 10: |
| | ==Misuse== | | ==Misuse== |
| | ''Add ideas here'' | | ''Add ideas here'' |
| − | *Attempts to discredit Conservapedia | + | <s>*Attempts to discredit Conservapedia |
| | **I think this is WAY too restrictive. It would make pretty much ALL current news reports and blogs that reported on Conservapedia guilty of copyright violation. And I'm (still) not a lawyer, but what does Fair Use say there? --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 23:39, 11 March 2007 (EDT) | | **I think this is WAY too restrictive. It would make pretty much ALL current news reports and blogs that reported on Conservapedia guilty of copyright violation. And I'm (still) not a lawyer, but what does Fair Use say there? --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 23:39, 11 March 2007 (EDT) |
| | | | |
| | : Good points, Sid. I think we could delete that item you reference ("Attempts to discredit Conservapedia"). We respect free speech rights to criticize us.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 23:43, 11 March 2007 (EDT) | | : Good points, Sid. I think we could delete that item you reference ("Attempts to discredit Conservapedia"). We respect free speech rights to criticize us.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 23:43, 11 March 2007 (EDT) |
| | + | </s>Strike [[User:Geo.plrd|Geo.]] 23:45, 11 March 2007 (EDT) |
| | *Changing information negatively and then citing Conservapedia | | *Changing information negatively and then citing Conservapedia |
| | *Harming an editor in some way, such as publishing his name with his entries in a way that hurts his employment | | *Harming an editor in some way, such as publishing his name with his entries in a way that hurts his employment |
| | *Copying the entire site and using it to confuse potential visitors in some manner | | *Copying the entire site and using it to confuse potential visitors in some manner |
| | *Copying material and then incorporating it into something that claims a new copyright that is asserted back against Conservapedia or an editor | | *Copying material and then incorporating it into something that claims a new copyright that is asserted back against Conservapedia or an editor |