Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,794
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
New York City Board of Education v. Tom F. (view source)
Revision as of 02:32, August 27, 2007
, 02:32, August 27, 2007New page: This case presents a question to the U.S. Supreme Court concerning judges and elections:<ref>Bd. of Educ. v. Tom F., No. 06-637. Certiorari granted Feb. 26, 2007. Ruling below:...
This case presents a question to the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] concerning [[judges]] and [[elections]]:<ref>Bd. of Educ. v. Tom F., No. 06-637. Certiorari granted Feb. 26, 2007. Ruling below: 193 Fed. Appx. 26 (2d Cir. 2006).</ref>
*Does the holding of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit,
stating that the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act permits tuition reimbursement where a child has not previously received special education from a public agency, stand in direct contradiction to the plain language of 20 U.S.C. §
1412(a)(10)(C)(ii) which authorizes tuition reimbursement to the parents of a
disabled child “who previously received special education and related services
under the authority of a public agency”?
== References ==
<references/>
[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
*Does the holding of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit,
stating that the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act permits tuition reimbursement where a child has not previously received special education from a public agency, stand in direct contradiction to the plain language of 20 U.S.C. §
1412(a)(10)(C)(ii) which authorizes tuition reimbursement to the parents of a
disabled child “who previously received special education and related services
under the authority of a public agency”?
== References ==
<references/>
[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]