1,523
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 559:
Line 559: + +
→Another definition of liberal -2
::::[[User:Jazzman831|Jazz]][[User talk:Jazzman831|Man]] 00:29, 30 August 2007 (EDT)
::::[[User:Jazzman831|Jazz]][[User talk:Jazzman831|Man]] 00:29, 30 August 2007 (EDT)
:::::Just don't see where any of it applies; especially in light of of liberal support of realism. [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 00:42, 30 August 2007 (EDT)
:::::Just don't see where any of it applies; especially in light of of liberal support of realism. [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 00:42, 30 August 2007 (EDT)
<--- Rob, what the hell? You are trying to say that the UN disproves my definition, because it's a liberal organization that acts like a realist. That is a complete logical fallacy -- it either is liberal, or it is realist. Pick one. If it follows my definition it's a liberal, and if it doesn't it's a realist. You simply ''can't'' use it as an example to disprove my definition. (And at any rate, your argument shows a poor understanding of liberalism; "supporting" realism doesn't necessarily negate liberalism.) Besides, I thought we agreed to disagree about the UN anyway. Why do you keep bringing up other issues? [[User:Jazzman831|Jazz]][[User talk:Jazzman831|Man]] 10:47, 30 August 2007 (EDT)
==pedophile Peacekeepers and the UN as a "liberal organization"==
==pedophile Peacekeepers and the UN as a "liberal organization"==