Changes

:::::Just don't see where any of it applies; especially in light of of liberal support of realism.  [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 00:42, 30 August 2007 (EDT)

:::::Just don't see where any of it applies; especially in light of of liberal support of realism.  [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 00:42, 30 August 2007 (EDT)

<--- Rob, what the hell? You are trying to say that the UN disproves my definition, because it's a liberal organization that acts like a realist. That is a complete logical fallacy -- it either is liberal, or it is realist. Pick one. If it follows my definition it's a liberal, and if it doesn't it's a realist. You simply ''can't'' use it as an example to disprove my definition. (And at any rate, your argument shows a poor understanding of liberalism; "supporting" realism doesn't necessarily negate liberalism.) Besides, I thought we agreed to disagree about the UN anyway. Why do you keep bringing up other issues? [[User:Jazzman831|Jazz]][[User talk:Jazzman831|Man]] 10:47, 30 August 2007 (EDT)

<--- Rob, with all due respect: what the hell? You are trying to say that the UN disproves my definition, because it's a liberal organization that acts like a realist. That is a complete logical fallacy -- it either is liberal, or it is realist. Pick one. If it follows my definition it's a liberal, and if it doesn't it's a realist. You simply ''can't'' use it as an example to disprove my definition. (And at any rate, your argument shows a poor understanding of liberalism; "supporting" realism doesn't necessarily negate liberalism.) Besides, I thought we agreed to disagree about the UN anyway. Why do you keep bringing up other issues? [[User:Jazzman831|Jazz]][[User talk:Jazzman831|Man]] 10:47, 30 August 2007 (EDT)

==pedophile Peacekeepers and the UN as a "liberal organization"==

==pedophile Peacekeepers and the UN as a "liberal organization"==