1,523
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 564:
Line 564: + +
→Another definition of liberal -2
::Fine, what is it then? [[User:Jazzman831|Jazz]][[User talk:Jazzman831|Man]] 17:14, 30 August 2007 (EDT)
::Fine, what is it then? [[User:Jazzman831|Jazz]][[User talk:Jazzman831|Man]] 17:14, 30 August 2007 (EDT)
:::Its a conglomeration of some sort. It supposedly has lofty ideals, but an abysmal record, particularly since its very founding. It has fundamental flaws in who it allows as members. And most troubling aspect of all is the pure tripe and disinformation it indocrtinates child with in the American public school system regarding (a) it purpose, (b) how it functions, (c) its history. [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 17:22, 30 August 2007 (EDT)
:::Its a conglomeration of some sort. It supposedly has lofty ideals, but an abysmal record, particularly since its very founding. It has fundamental flaws in who it allows as members. And most troubling aspect of all is the pure tripe and disinformation it indocrtinates child with in the American public school system regarding (a) it purpose, (b) how it functions, (c) its history. [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 17:22, 30 August 2007 (EDT)
:::Well, if you refuse to label it, then it doesn't really hurt my definition, right? I took the UN out of the definition, just for you. [[User:Jazzman831|Jazz]][[User talk:Jazzman831|Man]] 17:26, 30 August 2007 (EDT)
==pedophile Peacekeepers and the UN as a "liberal organization"==
==pedophile Peacekeepers and the UN as a "liberal organization"==