Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
293,647
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 566:
Line 566: + + +
→Another definition of liberal -2: not much
:::Well, if you refuse to label it, then it doesn't really hurt my definition, right? I took the UN out of the definition, just for you. [[User:Jazzman831|Jazz]][[User talk:Jazzman831|Man]] 17:26, 30 August 2007 (EDT)
:::Well, if you refuse to label it, then it doesn't really hurt my definition, right? I took the UN out of the definition, just for you. [[User:Jazzman831|Jazz]][[User talk:Jazzman831|Man]] 17:26, 30 August 2007 (EDT)
::::The UN is a community of diplomats living in close proximity to one another. It almost a ''Sharashka'' of sorts, to use a Russian word. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sharashka][http://www.geocities.com/Athens/2740/circle.html] I see Ed Poor recently referred to it a "parliament", but it is not a parliament. By parliament we mean law making body. It is not a law making body, and has no legislative powers. You will note the American representative is an Ambassador, and not a Legislator; to be otherwise would be inviolation of the [[Separation of Powers]] doctrine, as any school child can discern.
::::It's just a location were various soveign governments get together and debate, discuss, and sometimes actually conclude various multilateral international agreements. But unlike a parliamentary system, those agreements are only binding upon the participatory powers, and not other non-signatories to an agreement. Use of force is a separate issue, and I can discuss that separately. [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 17:38, 30 August 2007 (EDT)
==pedophile Peacekeepers and the UN as a "liberal organization"==
==pedophile Peacekeepers and the UN as a "liberal organization"==