Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
293,568
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: − {{debate}} Line 64:
Line 63: + Line 73:
Line 73: + + + + + + + + + + + +
Conservapedia:Views of Larry Craig (view source)
Revision as of 19:07, August 31, 2007
, 19:07, August 31, 2007move diss
What's CP's view on Larry Craig?
What's CP's view on Larry Craig?
::::I think most definitely, he should have been fired, just like any other workplace. (Haha, I suddenly have an image of 300 million Americans doing the simultaneous Trump Cobra "you're fired" hand gesture.) [[User:ATang|ATang]] 14:44, 31 August 2007 (EDT)
::::I think most definitely, he should have been fired, just like any other workplace. (Haha, I suddenly have an image of 300 million Americans doing the simultaneous Trump Cobra "you're fired" hand gesture.) [[User:ATang|ATang]] 14:44, 31 August 2007 (EDT)
:::::Thank you. [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 15:01, 31 August 2007 (EDT)
'''Reponding to Rob from 14:09, not anything that follows after'''
'''Reponding to Rob from 14:09, not anything that follows after'''
::If "let's not go back and forth all day" was some kind of milquetoast apology, please clarify. [[User:Aziraphale|Aziraphale]] 14:45, 31 August 2007 (EDT)
::If "let's not go back and forth all day" was some kind of milquetoast apology, please clarify. [[User:Aziraphale|Aziraphale]] 14:45, 31 August 2007 (EDT)
:::Yes please spell it out; Craig appears to have voted "yes" to the Defense Appropriation Act that included "Don't Ask Don't Tell", unless I'm reading it wrong.
:::Clinton lied under oath, which was an impeachment charge. Lying under oath did not "rise to the level" of removal from office. Craig did precisely the opposite: plead guilty, and not ''nolo contendre'', to a sex-related charge. Guilty implies intent, which by biblical standards is the same as the act itself, as in the Clinton case. Craig did not "lie" about the guilty plea, he expressed '''regret''' that he did.
:::So apparantly at this point, lying about sex does not rise to the level of removal from office, but being a victim of institutional [[homophobic]] laws warrants character assassination. That seems to be the status of the case. [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 15:01, 31 August 2007 (EDT)
::::Rob, i'm going to reply to this on the debate page that Ed just created.--[[User:Porthos|Porthos]] 15:04, 31 August 2007 (EDT)
Too much blathering, unrelated to improving the [[Main Page]] or the (now unprotected) [[Larry Craig]] article. Any reason I shouldn't move all of this talk to [[Conservapedia:Views of Larry Craig]]? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 14:50, 31 August 2007 (EDT)
:That makes sense to me.--[[User:Porthos|Porthos]] 14:51, 31 August 2007 (EDT)