154
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: − Line 80:
Line 79: − + + +
Conservapedia:Views of Larry Craig (view source)
Revision as of 19:12, August 31, 2007
, 19:12, August 31, 2007no edit summary
What's CP's view on Larry Craig?
What's CP's view on Larry Craig?
:::So apparantly at this point, lying about sex does not rise to the level of removal from office, but being a victim of institutional [[homophobic]] laws warrants character assassination. That seems to be the status of the case. [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 15:01, 31 August 2007 (EDT)
:::So apparantly at this point, lying about sex does not rise to the level of removal from office, but being a victim of institutional [[homophobic]] laws warrants character assassination. That seems to be the status of the case. [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 15:01, 31 August 2007 (EDT)
::::Rob, i'm going to reply to this on the debate page that Ed just created.--[[User:Porthos|Porthos]] 15:04, 31 August 2007 (EDT)
::::Rob, I'm not really sure I see the parallel you're trying to draw between this case and Clinton. Whether, morally, Clinton should have been removed from office is a wholly separate matter from the Senate vote that acquitted him. Legality (or legislation) does not imply morality or vice versa.
Also, I'm '''really''' confused about your use of the term "homophobic". Let's put it this way...I'm 100% conservative when it comes to some things, like the right to bear arms. But I'm pretty liberal (or libertarian?) when it comes to social issues like <i>private</i> sexual expression. But even *I* don't think that sex in public places is okay. The laws against public lewdness are not homophobic; they apply equally to men and women and straight and gay.--[[User:Porthos|Porthos]] 15:12, 31 August 2007 (EDT)
Too much blathering, unrelated to improving the [[Main Page]] or the (now unprotected) [[Larry Craig]] article. Any reason I shouldn't move all of this talk to [[Conservapedia:Views of Larry Craig]]? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 14:50, 31 August 2007 (EDT)
Too much blathering, unrelated to improving the [[Main Page]] or the (now unprotected) [[Larry Craig]] article. Any reason I shouldn't move all of this talk to [[Conservapedia:Views of Larry Craig]]? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 14:50, 31 August 2007 (EDT)
:That makes sense to me.--[[User:Porthos|Porthos]] 14:51, 31 August 2007 (EDT)
:That makes sense to me.--[[User:Porthos|Porthos]] 14:51, 31 August 2007 (EDT)