Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
some points
Line 82: Line 82:     
::::Also, I'm '''really''' confused about your use of the term "homophobic".  Let's put it this way...I'm 100% conservative when it comes to some things, like the right to bear arms.  But I'm pretty liberal (or libertarian?) when it comes to social issues like <i>private</i> sexual expression.  But even *I* don't think that sex in public places is okay.  The laws against public lewdness are not homophobic; they apply equally to men and women and straight and gay.--[[User:Porthos|Porthos]] 15:12, 31 August 2007 (EDT)
 
::::Also, I'm '''really''' confused about your use of the term "homophobic".  Let's put it this way...I'm 100% conservative when it comes to some things, like the right to bear arms.  But I'm pretty liberal (or libertarian?) when it comes to social issues like <i>private</i> sexual expression.  But even *I* don't think that sex in public places is okay.  The laws against public lewdness are not homophobic; they apply equally to men and women and straight and gay.--[[User:Porthos|Porthos]] 15:12, 31 August 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
<--
 +
 +
*Clinton lied under oath about sex, which '''did not''' "rise to the level" of removal from office.  Craig confessed under oath to intent (the same as the act).  How does this "rise to the level" of removal from office?
 +
*Our [[homophobia]] article links to several [[American Psychological Association]] (APA) papers about "societal homophobia" and "internalized homophobia." Let's forget the internalized part in this discussion, and look at "societal homophobia."  Groups like NARTH say societal homophobia is a crock, whereas more (shall we say) "liberal" inclinded authors and organizations such as the APA maintain homosexuals are societal victims of homophobia, and "institutional homphobia," such as laws that target gays such as outlined in the ''ABC News'' article.  Many gay rights activists view the sting operation that netted Craig as discriminitory.  So we are back to the issue of hypocricy, once again.  [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 15:34, 31 August 2007 (EDT)
    
Too much blathering, unrelated to improving the [[Main Page]] or the (now unprotected) [[Larry Craig]] article. Any reason I shouldn't move all of this talk to [[Conservapedia:Views of Larry Craig]]? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 14:50, 31 August 2007 (EDT)
 
Too much blathering, unrelated to improving the [[Main Page]] or the (now unprotected) [[Larry Craig]] article. Any reason I shouldn't move all of this talk to [[Conservapedia:Views of Larry Craig]]? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 14:50, 31 August 2007 (EDT)
    
:That makes sense to me.--[[User:Porthos|Porthos]] 14:51, 31 August 2007 (EDT)
 
:That makes sense to me.--[[User:Porthos|Porthos]] 14:51, 31 August 2007 (EDT)
Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
292,431

edits

Navigation menu