Changes

This article is a midget trying to pull down giants. [[User:Mandrew|Mandrew]] 18:38, 6 September 2007 (EDT)

This article is a midget trying to pull down giants. [[User:Mandrew|Mandrew]] 18:38, 6 September 2007 (EDT)

"Andy is a privileged, ignorant man-child" [[User:Mandrew|Mandrew]] 18:41, 6 September 2007 (EDT)

"Andy is a privileged, ignorant man-child" [[User:Mandrew|Mandrew]] 18:41, 6 September 2007 (EDT)

Is there really anything he touches on that site that doesn't amount to "Liberals are big, stupid poopy-heads"? [[User:Mandrew|Mandrew]] 18:42, 6 September 2007 (EDT)

 

'Is there really anything he touches on that site that doesn't amount to "Liberals are big, stupid poopy-heads"? ' Nope. [[User:Mandrew|Mandrew]] 18:42, 6 September 2007 (EDT)

===real intellectuals===

===real intellectuals===

i think it would be helpful for this discussion if we had another essay about real intellecuals. liberal, conservative, or moderate. there are a few examples given on this page, but i think more might answer questions about who is included and who isn't. the founding fathers are a good example. i would be against people being included just for being well known conservatives. i admire much about george w bush, for example, but i wouldn't call him an "intellectual". he didn't run as one, and we didn't elect him for that. [[User:AuH2O|AuH2O]]

i think it would be helpful for this discussion if we had another essay about real intellecuals. liberal, conservative, or moderate. there are a few examples given on this page, but i think more might answer questions about who is included and who isn't. the founding fathers are a good example. i would be against people being included just for being well known conservatives. i admire much about george w bush, for example, but i wouldn't call him an "intellectual". he didn't run as one, and we didn't elect him for that. [[User:AuH2O|AuH2O]]