5
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 216:
Line 216: + + + + + +
Talk:Essay:Liberal Intellectualism (view source)
Revision as of 23:18, September 6, 2007
, 23:18, September 6, 2007→real intellectuals
===real intellectuals===
===real intellectuals===
i think it would be helpful for this discussion if we had another essay about real intellecuals. liberal, conservative, or moderate. there are a few examples given on this page, but i think more might answer questions about who is included and who isn't. the founding fathers are a good example. i would be against people being included just for being well known conservatives. i admire much about george w bush, for example, but i wouldn't call him an "intellectual". he didn't run as one, and we didn't elect him for that. [[User:AuH2O|AuH2O]]
i think it would be helpful for this discussion if we had another essay about real intellecuals. liberal, conservative, or moderate. there are a few examples given on this page, but i think more might answer questions about who is included and who isn't. the founding fathers are a good example. i would be against people being included just for being well known conservatives. i admire much about george w bush, for example, but i wouldn't call him an "intellectual". he didn't run as one, and we didn't elect him for that. [[User:AuH2O|AuH2O]]
==This is single handedly the most stupid thing I have ever seen==
And I have seen some stupid things...
Really, this is a shining example of the founders love for hatred. I am truly amazed, truly. This essay is the greatest exhibition of a fusion of mind bogging hatred and anti-intellectualism I have seen in my entire life. Truly mind boggling. [[User:Smith090|Smith090]] 19:18, 6 September 2007 (EDT)