4
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 214:
Line 214: + + + + + + + +
Talk:Essay:Liberal Intellectualism (view source)
Revision as of 01:48, September 7, 2007
, 01:48, September 7, 2007Recruiting
===real intellectuals===
===real intellectuals===
i think it would be helpful for this discussion if we had another essay about real intellecuals. liberal, conservative, or moderate. there are a few examples given on this page, but i think more might answer questions about who is included and who isn't. the founding fathers are a good example. i would be against people being included just for being well known conservatives. i admire much about george w bush, for example, but i wouldn't call him an "intellectual". he didn't run as one, and we didn't elect him for that. [[User:AuH2O|AuH2O]]
i think it would be helpful for this discussion if we had another essay about real intellecuals. liberal, conservative, or moderate. there are a few examples given on this page, but i think more might answer questions about who is included and who isn't. the founding fathers are a good example. i would be against people being included just for being well known conservatives. i admire much about george w bush, for example, but i wouldn't call him an "intellectual". he didn't run as one, and we didn't elect him for that. [[User:AuH2O|AuH2O]]
== Recruiting ==
For those of you still reading, Bayes, OldFaithful/NewFaithful, etc., you all did a great job fighting Aschlafly. Would you please join R<!----->ation<!--------->alW<!---------->iki? We'd love to have you there. We're devoted to laughing at, mocking, and actively fighting Conservapedia. You'd like it there; we're very impressed. Bayes, we even saved your essay.
Andy, this essay is a joke, right?
TK, you're a coward.-[[User:AveMaria|AveMaria]] 21:48, 6 September 2007 (EDT)