Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
reply
Line 89: Line 89:     
:Dear Mr. Schlafly. Thank you for the prize. I hope my  [[Bible]] citation was correct. It would be a shame if I quoted something, for example [[Shakespeare]], and got it horribly wrong. I'm glad you found my contribution useful. It is a pleasure to have been of help. Oh by the way, would you be so kind as to list the intellectual achievements of your own which enable you to sit on such a high pedestal pontificating about the achievements or lack thereof by intellectual wannabees and pseudo-intellectuals. Godspeed [[User:JSmith|JSmith]] 09:44, 7 September 2007 (EDT)
 
:Dear Mr. Schlafly. Thank you for the prize. I hope my  [[Bible]] citation was correct. It would be a shame if I quoted something, for example [[Shakespeare]], and got it horribly wrong. I'm glad you found my contribution useful. It is a pleasure to have been of help. Oh by the way, would you be so kind as to list the intellectual achievements of your own which enable you to sit on such a high pedestal pontificating about the achievements or lack thereof by intellectual wannabees and pseudo-intellectuals. Godspeed [[User:JSmith|JSmith]] 09:44, 7 September 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
:: Well done, JSmith, you exhibited two examples of [[liberal style]], now ranked #7 on Google searches, in just one sentence:
 +
 +
::* #7) over-reliance on accusations of hypocrisy
 +
::* #25) using non sequiturs in argument
 +
 +
:: Surely you don't think that it's unfair to question whether someone promoted as an intellectual really is one.  In Christ,--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 19:16, 7 September 2007 (EDT)
    
==Motivation==
 
==Motivation==
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,620

edits

Navigation menu