Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
779 bytes added ,  18:03, September 8, 2007
Line 457: Line 457:     
A pattern develops.  So what is the official German version that motivated the German-Soviet War?  Comintern subversive activities.  How did the Soviert Union obtain atomic weapons knowhow from Los Alamos?  Comintern subversive activities.  How did  the CPUSA & the Soviet Union penetrate the White House, the Manhattan Project, the OSS, the State, Treasury, and War Depts?  Comintern subversive activities.  What was McCarthy investigating? Comintern subversive activities.  [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 22:54, 2 September 2007 (EDT)
 
A pattern develops.  So what is the official German version that motivated the German-Soviet War?  Comintern subversive activities.  How did the Soviert Union obtain atomic weapons knowhow from Los Alamos?  Comintern subversive activities.  How did  the CPUSA & the Soviet Union penetrate the White House, the Manhattan Project, the OSS, the State, Treasury, and War Depts?  Comintern subversive activities.  What was McCarthy investigating? Comintern subversive activities.  [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 22:54, 2 September 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
Arthur Herman does a good job when he sticks to facts and relies on the Congressional Record and other official documents. Herman fails when he attempts to make nice with the liberals by spreading the same unsubstantianted rumors that had been making the rounds in the early 1950's. I've noticed that the anti-McCarthy info that Herman cites usually has no citation or is attributed to incredibly unreliable sources. One example is where Herman makes a reference to Oshinsky who makes reference to another source that ultimately is just a rumor. That's how a great deal of these "biographies" have been written and the article here at Conservapedia has done the best job in sticking merely to the facts and avoiding rumor. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 14:03, 8 September 2007 (EDT)
428

edits

Navigation menu