Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 28: Line 28:     
*Your aim is obviously to use [[Deceit]] and always misstate or justify your own words and deeds, spin them after the fact, when caught.  Then when given an instruction from an Administrator, you came back and told me what an editors job is. I am not hostile, I am merely stating facts in a clear and concise manner, that you obviously cannot handle anyone being so direct, and interpret it as hostility. That is a Liberal trait.  Anything they do not agree with is not factual. --<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]</font><sup><font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font></sup> 21:08, 20 September 2007 (EDT)
 
*Your aim is obviously to use [[Deceit]] and always misstate or justify your own words and deeds, spin them after the fact, when caught.  Then when given an instruction from an Administrator, you came back and told me what an editors job is. I am not hostile, I am merely stating facts in a clear and concise manner, that you obviously cannot handle anyone being so direct, and interpret it as hostility. That is a Liberal trait.  Anything they do not agree with is not factual. --<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]</font><sup><font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font></sup> 21:08, 20 September 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
::...I think this qualifies as a Catch-22 situation, doesn't it?
 +
::If I say "Yes" to your accusation, I'm a deceitful liberal. If I say "No" to your accusation, I deny that I'm a liberal, my denial can be seen as deceit, and I'm a deceitful liberal. So no matter what I answer, the outcome is the same. I guess the best course of action is for me to let you guys doing your thing while I edit in less controversial articles. --[[User:Jenkins|Jenkins]] 21:22, 20 September 2007 (EDT)
    
== Liberal bias and the NY Times ==
 
== Liberal bias and the NY Times ==
541

edits

Navigation menu