Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,649
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 71:
Line 71: + + + +
Talk:The New York Times (view source)
Revision as of 01:28, September 21, 2007
, 01:28, September 21, 2007Sulzberger/liberalism/Epstein of American Scholar
Also: "In 2004 the Pew Center found that the New York Times received a credibility score from Republicans of 14% compared to Democrats with 31%. Republicans' perceived bias of the New York Times is most likely caused by the Time's reputation for a relatively liberal editorial page, and because the paper has not endorsed a Republican Presidential candidate since Eisenhower in 1956."[http://www.aim.org/aim_report/4997_0_4_0_C/] [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 21:21, 20 September 2007 (EDT)
Also: "In 2004 the Pew Center found that the New York Times received a credibility score from Republicans of 14% compared to Democrats with 31%. Republicans' perceived bias of the New York Times is most likely caused by the Time's reputation for a relatively liberal editorial page, and because the paper has not endorsed a Republican Presidential candidate since Eisenhower in 1956."[http://www.aim.org/aim_report/4997_0_4_0_C/] [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 21:21, 20 September 2007 (EDT)
== Sulzberger/liberalism/Epstein of American Scholar ==
"In an article entitled “The Degradation of the New York Times,” Joseph Epstein—former editor of the American Scholar—writes, “the true politics of the new New York Times are to be found at work on the issues of feminism, racism, homosexuality—usually funneled through the totem of ‘diversity,’ which, reinforced by political correctness, I prefer to think of as totalitarian pluralism.” Epstein adds, “The way Sulzberger has backed up his conviction is not only through the writing he publishes but also through hiring and promotion practices inside the paper.”[http://www.independent.org/newsroom/article.asp?id=1065] [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 21:28, 20 September 2007 (EDT)