Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
see footnote. apparently life long episcopalian
Line 2: Line 2:  
'''Christian legal apologetics''' is a branch of [[Christian apologetics]] that affirms that the available evidence to defend [[Christianity]] argues for the veracity of the historical and central claims of Christianity when [[Western World|Western]] legal standards of weighing evidence are applied.  An area that has received considerable attention in the field of Christian legal apologetics is the [[Resurrection of Jesus Christ|resurrection of Jesus Christ]]. Legal scholars, legal authorities, an eminent lawyers such as [[Simon Greenleaf]], [[John Warwick Montgomery]], [[Lord Darling]], [[John Singleton Copley]], [[Hugo Grotius]], [[Lord Caldecote]], [[J. N. D. Anderson]], [[Lionel Luckhoo]], and many others have asserted that western legal standards argue for the resurrection of Christ. <ref>http://www.bibleteacher.org/sgtestimony.htm</ref><ref>http://www.mtio.com/articles/bissart1.htm</ref><ref>http://www.ankerberg.com/Articles/apologetics/AP0302W3.htm</ref><ref>http://lawreligionculturereview.blogspot.com/2005_01_01_lawreligionculturereview_archive.html</ref><ref>http://www.trinitysem.edu/journal/philjohnsonpap.html</ref><ref>http://www.trinitysem.edu/journal/philjohnsonpap.html</ref>  
 
'''Christian legal apologetics''' is a branch of [[Christian apologetics]] that affirms that the available evidence to defend [[Christianity]] argues for the veracity of the historical and central claims of Christianity when [[Western World|Western]] legal standards of weighing evidence are applied.  An area that has received considerable attention in the field of Christian legal apologetics is the [[Resurrection of Jesus Christ|resurrection of Jesus Christ]]. Legal scholars, legal authorities, an eminent lawyers such as [[Simon Greenleaf]], [[John Warwick Montgomery]], [[Lord Darling]], [[John Singleton Copley]], [[Hugo Grotius]], [[Lord Caldecote]], [[J. N. D. Anderson]], [[Lionel Luckhoo]], and many others have asserted that western legal standards argue for the resurrection of Christ. <ref>http://www.bibleteacher.org/sgtestimony.htm</ref><ref>http://www.mtio.com/articles/bissart1.htm</ref><ref>http://www.ankerberg.com/Articles/apologetics/AP0302W3.htm</ref><ref>http://lawreligionculturereview.blogspot.com/2005_01_01_lawreligionculturereview_archive.html</ref><ref>http://www.trinitysem.edu/journal/philjohnsonpap.html</ref><ref>http://www.trinitysem.edu/journal/philjohnsonpap.html</ref>  
   −
Dr. Simon Greenleaf was one of the principal founders of the [[Harvard Law School]].<ref>http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/jesus/greenleaf.html</ref> In addition, Greenleaf was the author of the classic three-volume text, ''A Treatise on the Law
+
Dr. '''Simon Greenleaf''' was one of the chief figures in the early daus of the [[Harvard Law School]], a legal scholar, and also served as a [[Isaac Royall, Jr.|Royall]] Professor at [[Harvard Law School]].<ref>Harvard University Library: [http://oasis.lib.harvard.edu/oasis/deliver/~law00056 Simon Greenleaf]</ref><ref>http://www.drbilllong.com/LegalHistory/Greenleaf.html</ref>   In addition, Greenleaf was the author of the classic three-volume text, ''A Treatise on the Law
 
of Evidence'' (1842) and according to Dr. Wilbur Smith this work "is still considered the greatest single authority on evidence in the entire literature on legal procedure.” <ref>http://www.johnankerberg.org/Articles/ATRJ/truth/ATRJ1203-EVPDF/ATRJ1203-EV-3.pdf</ref>  
 
of Evidence'' (1842) and according to Dr. Wilbur Smith this work "is still considered the greatest single authority on evidence in the entire literature on legal procedure.” <ref>http://www.johnankerberg.org/Articles/ATRJ/truth/ATRJ1203-EVPDF/ATRJ1203-EV-3.pdf</ref>  
−
In his law classes Dr. Greenleaf, who was an [[atheism|atheist]] at the time, would frequently attack the [[Bible]] until some of his Christian students challenged him to take his textbook and apply it to the Bible and to the Resurrection of Jesus Christ.<ref>http://www.apprising.org/archives/2006/09/thy_word_is_tru_1.html</ref><ref>http://www.allaboutthejourney.org/the-case-for-christ.htm</ref> Dr. Greenleaf accepted his students challenge and when he examined the evidence for the resurrection of Christ he became a Christian.<ref>http://www.allaboutthejourney.org/the-case-for-christ.htm</ref> In his essay the ''[[Testimony of the Evangelists Examined by the Rules of Evidence Administered in Courts of Justice]]'', Greenleaf wrote the following:  
+
In his essay the ''[[Testimony of the Evangelists Examined by the Rules of Evidence Administered in Courts of Justice]]'', Greenleaf wrote the following:  
 
{{cquote|All that Christianity asks of men…is, that they would be consistent with themselves; that they would treat its evidences as they treat the evidence of other things; and that they would try and judge its actors and witnesses, as they deal with their fellow men, when testifying to human affairs and actions, in human tribunals. Let the witnesses [to the Resurrection] be compared with themselves, with each other, and with surrounding facts and circumstances; and let their testimony be sifted, as if it were given in a court of justice, on the side of the adverse party, the witness being subjected to a rigorous cross-examination. The result, it is confidently believed, will be an undoubting conviction of their integrity, ability and truth.<ref>http://www.bibleteacher.org/sgtestimony.htm</ref>}}  
 
{{cquote|All that Christianity asks of men…is, that they would be consistent with themselves; that they would treat its evidences as they treat the evidence of other things; and that they would try and judge its actors and witnesses, as they deal with their fellow men, when testifying to human affairs and actions, in human tribunals. Let the witnesses [to the Resurrection] be compared with themselves, with each other, and with surrounding facts and circumstances; and let their testimony be sifted, as if it were given in a court of justice, on the side of the adverse party, the witness being subjected to a rigorous cross-examination. The result, it is confidently believed, will be an undoubting conviction of their integrity, ability and truth.<ref>http://www.bibleteacher.org/sgtestimony.htm</ref>}}  
 
==External Links==
 
==External Links==
Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,492

edits

Navigation menu