| | '''Christian legal apologetics''' is a branch of [[Christian apologetics]] that affirms that the available evidence to defend [[Christianity]] argues for the veracity of the historical and central claims of Christianity when [[Western World|Western]] legal standards of weighing evidence are applied. An area that has received considerable attention in the field of Christian legal apologetics is the [[Resurrection of Jesus Christ|resurrection of Jesus Christ]]. Legal scholars, legal authorities, an eminent lawyers such as [[Simon Greenleaf]], [[John Warwick Montgomery]], [[Lord Darling]], [[John Singleton Copley]], [[Hugo Grotius]], [[Lord Caldecote]], [[J. N. D. Anderson]], [[Lionel Luckhoo]], and many others have asserted that western legal standards argue for the resurrection of Christ. <ref>http://www.bibleteacher.org/sgtestimony.htm</ref><ref>http://www.mtio.com/articles/bissart1.htm</ref><ref>http://www.ankerberg.com/Articles/apologetics/AP0302W3.htm</ref><ref>http://lawreligionculturereview.blogspot.com/2005_01_01_lawreligionculturereview_archive.html</ref><ref>http://www.trinitysem.edu/journal/philjohnsonpap.html</ref><ref>http://www.trinitysem.edu/journal/philjohnsonpap.html</ref> | | '''Christian legal apologetics''' is a branch of [[Christian apologetics]] that affirms that the available evidence to defend [[Christianity]] argues for the veracity of the historical and central claims of Christianity when [[Western World|Western]] legal standards of weighing evidence are applied. An area that has received considerable attention in the field of Christian legal apologetics is the [[Resurrection of Jesus Christ|resurrection of Jesus Christ]]. Legal scholars, legal authorities, an eminent lawyers such as [[Simon Greenleaf]], [[John Warwick Montgomery]], [[Lord Darling]], [[John Singleton Copley]], [[Hugo Grotius]], [[Lord Caldecote]], [[J. N. D. Anderson]], [[Lionel Luckhoo]], and many others have asserted that western legal standards argue for the resurrection of Christ. <ref>http://www.bibleteacher.org/sgtestimony.htm</ref><ref>http://www.mtio.com/articles/bissart1.htm</ref><ref>http://www.ankerberg.com/Articles/apologetics/AP0302W3.htm</ref><ref>http://lawreligionculturereview.blogspot.com/2005_01_01_lawreligionculturereview_archive.html</ref><ref>http://www.trinitysem.edu/journal/philjohnsonpap.html</ref><ref>http://www.trinitysem.edu/journal/philjohnsonpap.html</ref> |
| − | Dr. '''Simon Greenleaf''' was one of the chief figures in the early daus of the [[Harvard Law School]], a legal scholar, and also served as a [[Isaac Royall, Jr.|Royall]] Professor at [[Harvard Law School]].<ref>Harvard University Library: [http://oasis.lib.harvard.edu/oasis/deliver/~law00056 Simon Greenleaf]</ref><ref>http://www.drbilllong.com/LegalHistory/Greenleaf.html</ref> In addition, Greenleaf was the author of the classic three-volume text, ''A Treatise on the Law | + | Dr. [[Simon Greenleaf]] was one of the chief figures in the early daus of the [[Harvard Law School]], a legal scholar, and also served as a [[Isaac Royall, Jr.|Royall]] Professor at [[Harvard Law School]].<ref>Harvard University Library: [http://oasis.lib.harvard.edu/oasis/deliver/~law00056 Simon Greenleaf]</ref><ref>http://www.drbilllong.com/LegalHistory/Greenleaf.html</ref> In addition, Greenleaf was the author of the classic three-volume text, ''A Treatise on the Law |
| | of Evidence'' (1842) and according to Dr. Wilbur Smith this work "is still considered the greatest single authority on evidence in the entire literature on legal procedure.” <ref>http://www.johnankerberg.org/Articles/ATRJ/truth/ATRJ1203-EVPDF/ATRJ1203-EV-3.pdf</ref> | | of Evidence'' (1842) and according to Dr. Wilbur Smith this work "is still considered the greatest single authority on evidence in the entire literature on legal procedure.” <ref>http://www.johnankerberg.org/Articles/ATRJ/truth/ATRJ1203-EVPDF/ATRJ1203-EV-3.pdf</ref> |
| | In his essay the ''[[Testimony of the Evangelists Examined by the Rules of Evidence Administered in Courts of Justice]]'', Greenleaf wrote the following: | | In his essay the ''[[Testimony of the Evangelists Examined by the Rules of Evidence Administered in Courts of Justice]]'', Greenleaf wrote the following: |