708
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 34:
Line 34: + + + + +
Talk:Conservative links (view source)
Revision as of 18:36, September 21, 2007
, 18:36, September 21, 2007→A few thoughts
Suggestion: Move the picture from "Arts" to "History", get rid of the cannon that is currently there, and look for more fitting images for the sections mentioned above (Rush for "Entertainment", for example). Optionally, look for somebody who is more representative than Sher Zieve for the "News" section. Some FOX anchorman maybe? --[[User:Jenkins|Jenkins]] 08:42, 21 September 2007 (EDT)
Suggestion: Move the picture from "Arts" to "History", get rid of the cannon that is currently there, and look for more fitting images for the sections mentioned above (Rush for "Entertainment", for example). Optionally, look for somebody who is more representative than Sher Zieve for the "News" section. Some FOX anchorman maybe? --[[User:Jenkins|Jenkins]] 08:42, 21 September 2007 (EDT)
== A few thoughts ==
The definition of virgin given on this page needs to be changed. As it is now it is not correct; it is not the marital status of someone that defines whether or not he or she is a virgin. Second, I don't feel like the large "OURS" picture at the top of the article is appropriate at all--there are beautiful people in all parts of the political spectrum, and that picture feels like it is needlessly going after sex-appeal and objectifying women. [[User:Jinkas|Jinkas]] 14:36, 21 September 2007 (EDT)