nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, Administrators
22,417
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 39:
Line 39: + +
Talk:Conservative links (view source)
Revision as of 19:12, September 21, 2007
, 19:12, September 21, 2007→A few thoughts
The definition of virgin given on this page needs to be changed. As it is now it is not correct; it is not the marital status of someone that defines whether or not he or she is a virgin. Second, I don't feel like the large "OURS" picture at the top of the article is appropriate at all--there are beautiful people in all parts of the political spectrum, and that picture feels like it is needlessly going after sex-appeal and objectifying women. [[User:Jinkas|Jinkas]] 14:36, 21 September 2007 (EDT)
The definition of virgin given on this page needs to be changed. As it is now it is not correct; it is not the marital status of someone that defines whether or not he or she is a virgin. Second, I don't feel like the large "OURS" picture at the top of the article is appropriate at all--there are beautiful people in all parts of the political spectrum, and that picture feels like it is needlessly going after sex-appeal and objectifying women. [[User:Jinkas|Jinkas]] 14:36, 21 September 2007 (EDT)
:Please, do not limit yourself to "thoughts". You may also collaborate. --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 15:12, 21 September 2007 (EDT)