18
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: − Shall we mention which ''liberal'' group was responsible for the hoax, or is the L word enough? Should we even mention what the hoax was, or is it sufficient to say 'it was a liberal hoax'? [[User:Maestro|Maestro]] 16:53, 27 September 2007 (EDT)+ − :Yes to both. Please do this. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 16:56, 27 September 2007 (EDT)+ − − ::I hadn't heard about this before. I'll look forward to the final entry! [[User:Graham|Graham]] 16:59, 27 September 2007 (EDT) − − : We should say which group, by name, and back it up with references. If it's the group I'm thinking of they also deserve a Conservapedia article about them - a sleazy multimillion dollar fundraising outfit pretending to be a "civil rights" group. [[User:Parrothead|Parrothead]] 17:06, 27 September 2007 (EDT) − − ==Trend== − − Did Fumento say there was a trend? That is, an annual increase in church burnings? I thought he said just the opposite: that church burnings had ''decreased'' over the same period ''USA Today'' and that liberal group said there had been an increase. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 17:19, 27 September 2007 (EDT) − :'That liberal group'...does it have a name? [[User:Maestro|Maestro]] 22:33, 27 September 2007 (EDT) − − ::If you keep refusing to tar an entire group of people with the same brush, we'll make a conservative out of you yet! :-) The group is [[CDR]], as currently stated in the article. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 10:13, 28 September 2007 (EDT)
Talk:Black church-burning hoax (view source)
Revision as of 14:34, September 28, 2007
, 14:34, September 28, 2007Replacing page with 'FREE SEX! FREE LOVE! THERE'S NO JESUS, ONLY FREE SEX! FREE INTERNET! FREE BURMA!'
FREE SEX! FREE LOVE!
THERE'S NO JESUS, ONLY FREE SEX! FREE INTERNET! FREE BURMA!