Reverted edits by Fd (Talk); changed back to last version by Ed Poor
Line 1:
Line 1:
−
FREE SEX! FREE LOVE!
+
Shall we mention which ''liberal'' group was responsible for the hoax, or is the L word enough? Should we even mention what the hoax was, or is it sufficient to say 'it was a liberal hoax'? [[User:Maestro|Maestro]] 16:53, 27 September 2007 (EDT)
−
THERE'S NO JESUS, ONLY FREE SEX! FREE INTERNET! FREE BURMA!
+
:Yes to both. Please do this. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 16:56, 27 September 2007 (EDT)
+
+
::I hadn't heard about this before. I'll look forward to the final entry! [[User:Graham|Graham]] 16:59, 27 September 2007 (EDT)
+
+
: We should say which group, by name, and back it up with references. If it's the group I'm thinking of they also deserve a Conservapedia article about them - a sleazy multimillion dollar fundraising outfit pretending to be a "civil rights" group. [[User:Parrothead|Parrothead]] 17:06, 27 September 2007 (EDT)
+
+
==Trend==
+
+
Did Fumento say there was a trend? That is, an annual increase in church burnings? I thought he said just the opposite: that church burnings had ''decreased'' over the same period ''USA Today'' and that liberal group said there had been an increase. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 17:19, 27 September 2007 (EDT)
+
:'That liberal group'...does it have a name? [[User:Maestro|Maestro]] 22:33, 27 September 2007 (EDT)
+
+
::If you keep refusing to tar an entire group of people with the same brush, we'll make a conservative out of you yet! :-) The group is [[CDR]], as currently stated in the article. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 10:13, 28 September 2007 (EDT)