Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,794
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
United States v. Kagama (view source)
Revision as of 22:45, September 28, 2007
, 22:45, September 28, 2007New page: In ''United States v. Kagama'', 118 U.S. 375, 384-85 (1886) the U.S. Supreme Court held that Indian tribes do not have exclusive jurisdiction over the prosecution of crimes. Feder...
In ''United States v. Kagama'', 118 U.S. 375, 384-85 (1886) the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held that Indian tribes do not have exclusive [[jurisdiction]] over the prosecution of crimes. Federal district courts also retained federal criminal jurisdiction over Indian tribes as authorized by [[Congress]].
[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
[[category:Indian Law]]
[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
[[category:Indian Law]]