Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Clarification
Line 1: Line 1: −
In ''United States v. Kagama'', 118 U.S. 375, 384-85 (1886) the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held that Indian tribes do not have exclusive [[jurisdiction]] over the prosecution of crimes.  Federal district courts also retained federal criminal jurisdiction over Indian tribes as authorized by [[Congress]].
+
In ''United States v. Kagama'', 118 U.S. 375, 384-85 (1886) the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held that Indian tribes do not have exclusive [[jurisdiction]] over the prosecution of crimes commited on reserve territory.  Federal district courts also retained federal criminal jurisdiction over Indian tribes as authorized by [[Congress]].
 
[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
 
[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
 
[[category:Indian Law]]
 
[[category:Indian Law]]
10

edits

Navigation menu