nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
26,487
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 1:
Line 1: − + + +
United States v. Kagama (view source)
Revision as of 07:15, November 24, 2007
, 07:15, November 24, 2007no edit summary
In ''United States v. Kagama'', 118 U.S. 375, 384-85 (1886) the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held that Indian tribes do not have exclusive [[jurisdiction]] over the prosecution of crimes commited on reserve territory. Federal district courts also retained federal criminal jurisdiction over Indian tribes as authorized by [[Congress]].
In ''United States v. Kagama'', 118 U.S. 375, 384-85 (1886) the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held that Indian tribes do not have exclusive [[jurisdiction]] over the prosecution of crimes commited on reservation territory. Federal district courts also retained federal criminal jurisdiction over Indian tribes as authorized by [[Congress]].
[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
[[category:Indian Law]]
[[category:Indian Law]]