10
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 23:
Line 23: + +
Debate:Is it okay for Conservapedia to have biased articles? (view source)
Revision as of 14:19, October 3, 2007
, 14:19, October 3, 2007no edit summary
like invading the publics personal and private lives and violating privacy with no good reason- [[User:mrRandom|mrRandom]]
like invading the publics personal and private lives and violating privacy with no good reason- [[User:mrRandom|mrRandom]]
The website is called '''Conserva'''pedia. Of course there's going to be bias. However, calling yourself "trustworthy" and "better then those gossiping wikipedia fools" is not okay, in my opinian.
==It's a meaningless question==
==It's a meaningless question==