5,580
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 24:
Line 24: − +
Debate:Is it okay for Conservapedia to have biased articles? (view source)
Revision as of 14:21, October 3, 2007
, 14:21, October 3, 2007→Yes
like invading the publics personal and private lives and violating privacy with no good reason- [[User:mrRandom|mrRandom]]
like invading the publics personal and private lives and violating privacy with no good reason- [[User:mrRandom|mrRandom]]
The website is called '''Conserva'''pedia. Of course there's going to be bias. However, calling yourself "trustworthy" and "better then those gossiping wikipedia fools" is not okay, in my opinian.
The website is called '''Conserva'''pedia. Of course there's going to be bias. However, calling yourself "trustworthy" and "better then those gossiping wikipedia fools" is not okay, in my opinian. {{unsigned|1984}}
==It's a meaningless question==
==It's a meaningless question==