111
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 25:
Line 25: + +
Debate:Is it okay for Conservapedia to have biased articles? (view source)
Revision as of 04:26, May 16, 2008
, 04:26, May 16, 2008no edit summary
The website is called '''Conserva'''pedia. Of course there's going to be bias. However, calling yourself "trustworthy" and "better then those gossiping wikipedia fools" is not okay, in my opinian. {{unsigned|1984}}
The website is called '''Conserva'''pedia. Of course there's going to be bias. However, calling yourself "trustworthy" and "better then those gossiping wikipedia fools" is not okay, in my opinian. {{unsigned|1984}}
i really have to agree to the person ahead of me it IS called conservapedia, if i made a website called www.super-man-is-awesome.com then it would be ok to be a little biased, but the bias is still quite annoying-[[User:Greenmeanie|Greenmeanie]] 00:26, 16 May 2008 (EDT)
==It's a meaningless question==
==It's a meaningless question==