92
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 63:
Line 63: +
Conservapedia:AFD Gay Bowel Syndrome (view source)
Revision as of 04:26, October 4, 2007
, 04:26, October 4, 2007→Vote Tally
I'm sorry, but I don't trust Conservative to have accurately cited the articles. Further, I think it best that his sourcing and citation be open for critics and admirers to see. Also, it's extremely unencyclopedic to just take his word for it.-[[User:MichaelS|MichaelS]] 00:11, 4 October 2007 (EDT)
I'm sorry, but I don't trust Conservative to have accurately cited the articles. Further, I think it best that his sourcing and citation be open for critics and admirers to see. Also, it's extremely unencyclopedic to just take his word for it.-[[User:MichaelS|MichaelS]] 00:11, 4 October 2007 (EDT)
*Traditional values Coaltion and Concerned Women for America are precisely the sources we should be using and linking to for articles. [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 00:21, 4 October 2007 (EDT)
*Traditional values Coaltion and Concerned Women for America are precisely the sources we should be using and linking to for articles. [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 00:21, 4 October 2007 (EDT)
::They're not medical journals. Let's see the medical journal cites. Also, here's an article that elegantly disproves creationism. You can access it [http://www.economist.com/world/na/displaystory.cfm?story_id=E1_QNPNQPT here], and the cited material is in the third paragraph. What, no Economist password? Oh, then just trust me.-[[User:MichaelS|MichaelS]] 00:26, 4 October 2007 (EDT)
Leaving aside questions of trust, it is clear that the vote is squarely against you, Conservative, with several sysops opposing the article. I believe that unless there is a significant change to the vote tally over the next day or so, the article should be deleted. [[User:SSchultz|SSchultz]] 00:23, 4 October 2007 (EDT)
Leaving aside questions of trust, it is clear that the vote is squarely against you, Conservative, with several sysops opposing the article. I believe that unless there is a significant change to the vote tally over the next day or so, the article should be deleted. [[User:SSchultz|SSchultz]] 00:23, 4 October 2007 (EDT)