Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
293,535
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 65:
Line 65: + + +
Conservapedia:AFD Gay Bowel Syndrome (view source)
Revision as of 04:49, October 4, 2007
, 04:49, October 4, 2007→Vote Tally: Some advice.
::They're not medical journals. Let's see the medical journal cites. Also, here's an article that elegantly disproves creationism. You can access it [http://www.economist.com/world/na/displaystory.cfm?story_id=E1_QNPNQPT here], and the cited material is in the third paragraph. What, no Economist password? Oh, then just trust me.-[[User:MichaelS|MichaelS]] 00:26, 4 October 2007 (EDT)
::They're not medical journals. Let's see the medical journal cites. Also, here's an article that elegantly disproves creationism. You can access it [http://www.economist.com/world/na/displaystory.cfm?story_id=E1_QNPNQPT here], and the cited material is in the third paragraph. What, no Economist password? Oh, then just trust me.-[[User:MichaelS|MichaelS]] 00:26, 4 October 2007 (EDT)
Leaving aside questions of trust, it is clear that the vote is squarely against you, Conservative, with several sysops opposing the article. I believe that unless there is a significant change to the vote tally over the next day or so, the article should be deleted. [[User:SSchultz|SSchultz]] 00:23, 4 October 2007 (EDT)
Leaving aside questions of trust, it is clear that the vote is squarely against you, Conservative, with several sysops opposing the article. I believe that unless there is a significant change to the vote tally over the next day or so, the article should be deleted. [[User:SSchultz|SSchultz]] 00:23, 4 October 2007 (EDT)
:*We've been down this road on the discussion surrounding the AMA's decision to stop treating people seeking treatment for homosexuality. The APA's position statement says presiciely the decision is based upon social & political factors, not medical and scientific. So sorry, Maestro, that argument not only does not wash, it missed the point.
:*And SSchultz, we're not a moborcacy; if you wish to begin removing links to we have to in all the our pop culture articles to home pages of rock groups that are [[Satan]] worshipers and wish to begin replacing them with links to the TVC or CWA, somebody may pay more attention to you. [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 00:49, 4 October 2007 (EDT)