Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
2 bytes removed ,  09:18, October 7, 2007
no edit summary
Line 11: Line 11:  
William Corliss wrote the following regarding [[paraconformity|paraconformities]]:
 
William Corliss wrote the following regarding [[paraconformity|paraconformities]]:
   −
{{QuoteBox|Potentially more important to geological thinking are those [[unconformity|unconformities]] that signal large chunks of geological history are missing, even though the strata on either side of the unconformity are perfectly parallel and show no evidence of erosion. Did millions of years fly by with no discernible effect? A possible though controversial inference is that our geological clocks and stratigraphic concepts need working on.<ref>Corliss, 1980, quoted by Plaisted, David A., [http://www.cs.unc.edu/~plaisted/ce/flood.html Geological Evidences for a Flood]</ref>}}
+
{{cquote|Potentially more important to geological thinking are those [[unconformity|unconformities]] that signal large chunks of geological history are missing, even though the strata on either side of the unconformity are perfectly parallel and show no evidence of erosion. Did millions of years fly by with no discernible effect? A possible though controversial inference is that our geological clocks and stratigraphic concepts need working on.<ref>Corliss, 1980, quoted by Plaisted, David A., [http://www.cs.unc.edu/~plaisted/ce/flood.html Geological Evidences for a Flood]</ref>}}
    
== Publications ==
 
== Publications ==
Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,427

edits

Navigation menu