Changes

William Corliss wrote the following regarding [[paraconformity|paraconformities]]:

William Corliss wrote the following regarding [[paraconformity|paraconformities]]:

{{cquote|Potentially more important to geological thinking are those [[unconformity|unconformities]] that signal large chunks of geological history are missing, even though the strata on either side of the unconformity are perfectly parallel and show no evidence of erosion. Did millions of years fly by with no discernible effect? A possible though controversial inference is that our geological clocks and stratigraphic concepts need working on.<ref>Corliss, 1980, quoted by Plaisted, David A., [http://www.cs.unc.edu/~plaisted/ce/flood.html Geological Evidences for a Flood]</ref>}}

{{cquote|Potentially more important to geological thinking are those [[unconformity|unconformities]] that signal large chunks of geological history are missing, even though the strata on either side of the unconformity are perfectly parallel and show no evidence of erosion. Did millions of years fly by with no discernible effect? A possible though controversial inference is that our geological clocks and stratigraphic concepts need working on.<ref>Corliss, 1980, quoted by Plaisted, David A., [http://www.cs.unc.edu/~plaisted/ce/flood.html Geological Evidences for a Flood]</ref>}}