Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
96 bytes removed ,  16:03, October 7, 2007
m
Are we now implying that all the random meme vandals are liberals and that they vandalized that article to mock "Conservative interpretations of science"?
Line 12: Line 12:  
<br>9.  Conversion <ref>David Kupelian, [http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=49958 How Ohio State University is marketing evil] "We mean conversion of the average American’s emotions, mind, and will, through a planned psychological attack, in the form of propaganda fed to the nation via the media. We mean "subverting" the mechanism of prejudice to our own ends – using the very processes that made America hate us to turn their hatred into warm regard – whether they like it or not."</ref>
 
<br>9.  Conversion <ref>David Kupelian, [http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=49958 How Ohio State University is marketing evil] "We mean conversion of the average American’s emotions, mind, and will, through a planned psychological attack, in the form of propaganda fed to the nation via the media. We mean "subverting" the mechanism of prejudice to our own ends – using the very processes that made America hate us to turn their hatred into warm regard – whether they like it or not."</ref>
 
<br>10. Undermining religion
 
<br>10. Undermining religion
−
<br>11. Mocking Conservative interpretations of science<ref>http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Big_Bang_Theory&diff=311206&oldid=309507</ref>
+
<br>11. Mocking Conservative interpretations of science
    
Please add to the list or adjust priorities, or add examples (as references) to illustrate how these liberal tools are used.
 
Please add to the list or adjust priorities, or add examples (as references) to illustrate how these liberal tools are used.
541

edits

Navigation menu