5,580
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 5:
Line 5: + + + +
explaination of removal
:::It should not be THAT hard to find sources about the Irish Times. But it should be hard to find sources for the numerous broad claims scattered all the way through the article. If I (fact)-tagged all bold claims, I'd get banned for being a vandal because 25% of the article would be superscripted "Citation needed"s. --[[User:Jenkins|Jenkins]] 22:38, 8 October 2007 (EDT)
:::It should not be THAT hard to find sources about the Irish Times. But it should be hard to find sources for the numerous broad claims scattered all the way through the article. If I (fact)-tagged all bold claims, I'd get banned for being a vandal because 25% of the article would be superscripted "Citation needed"s. --[[User:Jenkins|Jenkins]] 22:38, 8 October 2007 (EDT)
::::True dat. I removed the following until/if we find sources:
:::::"The Irish Times was in favor of legalizing [[homosexuality]] in 1993, despite the majority of Irish people being opposed to the Homosexual agenda's role in dictating Irish affairs. Similarly, the Irish Times has been guilty of insulting the [[Catholic Church]], a much revered institution in Irish life and is also guilty of promoting the drive to secularism that is eating the island inside. The collapse of the family and the rise of hard drug usage can easily be corresponded with the influence the Irish Times has with the Irish [[Liberal Elite]]."
::::I think it's ok to call the paper liberal, but the rest should be supported. At a minimum I think most of the above statements only apply to the editorial section, not the whole paper. But as I said, I haven't read it, so if someone can prove me wrong then be my guest! [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 23:20, 8 October 2007 (EDT)